{"id":212,"date":"2007-11-12T11:45:40","date_gmt":"2007-11-12T16:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.randomideas.net\/?p=212"},"modified":"2007-11-12T11:45:40","modified_gmt":"2007-11-12T16:45:40","slug":"finer-tuning-the-strong-anthropic-principle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/?p=212","title":{"rendered":"Finer-tuning the Strong Anthropic Principle"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The strong anthropic principle states that any viable universe must have the capacity for observation; that is, life must evolve in it. If the multi-worlds interpretation is correct, however, we may not all necessarily be in the same universe (if &#8220;quantum immortality&#8221; is correct, it gets even weirder: people might be in the same universe at one moment in time and may forever diverge at a future branching point as their own survival takes them along different paths).<\/p>\n<p>I wonder whether we can propose a &#8220;strongest anthropic principle&#8221; of some sort that roughly states that the particular universe each person (or lifeform in general) inhabits evolved specifically for that person\/organism rather than for the general existence of life as a whole. The existence of multiple universes would permit it.<\/p>\n<p>We could even take it further, actually, and permit free will under the assumption of determinism (disclaimer: I am not a determinist), though this treads dangerous philosophical and theological ground because it would essentially argue that we are God: if the initial state of the universe is organized for a specific organism, it may be organized for the organism&#8217;s free will, or even <i>by<\/i> the organism&#8217;s free will.<\/p>\n<p>Not that I believe this, but the ideas are intriguing. It&#8217;s the ultimate philosophy of egocentrism \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The strong anthropic principle states that any viable universe must have the capacity for observation; that is, life must evolve in it. If the multi-worlds interpretation is correct, however, we may not all necessarily be in the same universe (if &#8220;quantum immortality&#8221; is correct, it gets even weirder: people might be in the same universe [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ideas","category-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=212"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/randomideas.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}