Because of my unique “panidealist” philosophy, I am perhaps the worst person to ask to review papers. If we cannot assess the full impact of an idea (an axiom in the philosophy), something would have to be horribly wrong for me to reject a paper because doing so may very well impose my ignorance upon others.

I hate the way the scientific establishment works. No small group of people should act as gatekeepers. Just let the ideas go before the community as a whole and let them choose which to work with. If you are too worried about massive amounts of quackery, let them “digg” or “bury” papers and sort by number of “diggs” / citations. It will work.